Added 4 Months Ago

In this provocative essay, Adrian Vermeule argues that the common welfare clause in the constitution should be used as the basis for new right-wing constitutionalism to succeed originalism. Conservatives, like liberals today, could use the courts to achieve their policy goals more easily under this method.

In recent years, allegiance to the constitutional theory known as originalism has become all but mandatory for American legal conservatives. Every justice and almost every judge nominated by recent Republican administrations has pledged adherence to the faith. At the Federalist Society, the influential association of legal conservatives, speakers talk and think of little else. Even some luminaries of the left-liberal legal academy have moved away from speaking about “living constitutionalism,” “fundamental fairness,” and “evolving standards of decency,” and have instead justified their views in originalist terms. One often hears the catchphrase “We are all originalists now.”

Originalism comes in several varieties (baroque debates about key theoretical ideas rage among its proponents), but their common core is the view that constitutional meaning was fixed at the time of the Constitution’s enactment. This approach served legal conservatives well in the hostile environment in which originalism was first developed, and for some time afterward.

Stay up to date with us

Subscribe

Get weekly Canon roundups straight to your inbox