Ultimately, radical commitment to “self” is not empowerment but a form of fear and enslavement. An unwillingness to change or sacrifice is the sign that something is frozen and dying; it’s not the mark of a vivacious woman who is pursuing her best life.

I came of age in the milieu of articles like The Atlantic’s “Why Women Still Can’t Have It All,” which wrestles with the sacrifices women make in their career to be a good mother and raise successful, well-adjusted children.

Today, however, a shift seems to have taken place in our cultural narrative that views marriage and children as secondary to a woman’s purpose and value in life. This is the case with Lara Bazelon’s New York Times article “Divorce Can Be an Act of Radical Self-Love.”

The most concerning part is her relentless commitment to self, at the expense of her marriage, family, and even her own ability to grow. Indeed, this isn’t “self-love.” It’s a fear of change that fuels self-glorified behavior. Refusal to change, to grow, or to be formed through the relationships around you is what the dead do. Radical “self-love” philosophies have more in common with a graveyard than a living person. Think of the beloved stuffed animals we held as children or the oft-read books we love today. Even these material objects bear the marks of our affection. How much more does that of a living human being? To be alive means that your relationships, your responsibilities, and your environment necessarily change you and require something of you.

Stay up to date with us

Subscribe

Get weekly Canon roundups straight to your inbox